Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) vs Poco F7 Pro 5G
Quick Comparison
Poco F7 Pro 5G has better RAM than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB). In terms of display resolution, Poco F7 Pro 5G has better resolution of 3200 x 1440 than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) which has resolution of 2400 x 1080. Poco F7 Pro 5G has more internal memory than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB)
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) | Poco F7 Pro 5G |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Internal Memory | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Camera | 64 MP Quad | 50 MP + 8 MP Dual |
| Price | Rs. 13999 | Rs. 42990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is March 12, 2020 . The cost of Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) is Rs. 13999. The launch Date of the second phone is March 27, 2025. The Expected cost of Poco F7 Pro 5G is Rs. 42990.
Display comparison
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) has IPS LCD Screen type where as Poco F7 Pro 5G has AMOLED Screen type. Poco's phone has display density of 526 PPI & Xiaomi's phone has only 395 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Poco's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 89.3% than Xiaomi's phone ~ 84.6%. Both mobiles have same aspect ratio of 20:9.
Memory comparison
Poco F7 Pro 5G's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB)'s lower 8 GB RAM. Poco F7 Pro 5G has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB)'s 64 MP Quad Rear Camera outshines Poco F7 Pro 5G's 50 MP + 8 MP Dual Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Poco F7 Pro 5G's 20 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 10.0 and the second one on 15 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max (8GB RAM +128GB) | Poco F7 Pro 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Redmi Note 9 Pro Max | F7 Pro |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | March 12, 2020 | March 27, 2025 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 76.68 x 165.5 x 8.8 mm | 75 x 160.3 x 8.1 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 206 g |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (68.7 B) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels | 6.67 inches, 1440 x 3200 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 395 PPI | ~ 526 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 84.6% | ~ 89.3% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Features | Triple Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Standard Mode, Sunshine Mode, Night mode, Color Temperature Adjustment | Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 512 GB | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | Yes |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC Support | Yes, with A-GPS. Up to tri-band: GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ambient Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor, E Compass, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Proximity, Gyro, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 2.5 m upto 30 min | |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | UFS2.1 | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 64 MP ƒ/1.79 (Main) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 5 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Depth Sensor) | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Night mode, AI Scene detection, Smart ultra-wide angle mode | AI Beautify | Burst mode | Tilt-shift | Level display | Custom watermark | Pro mode | AI Portrait mode, 3D Lighting, Panorama mode | Color Spectrum Sensor, HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30/60 fps FHD, 720p @ 30 fps HD | 8K @ 24 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2 (Main) | 20 MP (Wide Angle) Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p @ 30 fps HD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v10.0, upgradable to v11 | Android v15 |
| Custom UI | HyperOS 2 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| CPU | 2.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver | 1xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 5xCortex-A720@3.2 GHz & 2x Cortex-A520@2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 750 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AMR, FLAC, APE | Yes |
| Video | MP4, M4V, MKV, XVID | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5020 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 6000 mAh |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 33W Fast Charging | Yes, 90W Fast charging |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| StandBy Time | 20 days | |
| Music Playback Time | 210 hours | |