Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 5G
Quick Comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has better RAM than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. In terms of display resolution, Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has better resolution of 3200 x 1440 than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G which has resolution of 2400 x 1080. Both have the same amount of internal memory.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 5G |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.5 in | 6.2 in |
| Internal Memory | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Camera | 64 MP Quad | 64 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 34990 | Rs. 74999 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is expected to be December 22, 2024 (Expected). The Expected cost of Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is Rs. 34990. The launch Date of the second phone is February 11, 2020. The Expected cost of Samsung Galaxy S20 5G is Rs. 74999.
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has screen size of 6.2 inches which falls short to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's 6.5 inch screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Super AMOLED Screen type where as Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has Screen type. Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has display density of 563 PPI & Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has only 405 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has better screen to body ratio of ~ 89.5% than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's ~ 84.9%. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio where as Samsung Galaxy S20 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G's larger 8 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's lower 6 GB RAM. and both have same Internal Memory of 128 GB.
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's 64 MP Quad Rear Camera outshines Samsung Galaxy S20 5G's 64 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy S20 5G's 10 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 11 and the second one on 10.0 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Galaxy A52 | S20 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | December 22, 2024 (Expected) | February 11, 2020 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 75.1 x 159.9 x 8.4 mm | 69.1 x 151.7 x 7.9 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 163 g |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color Super AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) | Color Dynamic AMOLED 2X (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.2 inches, 1440 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 405 PPI | ~ 563 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 84.9% | ~ 89.5% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Features | HDR10+, 120 Hz Refresh Rate, Curved Display | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 1 TB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.0 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v3.2 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, RGB Light Sensor |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 64 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 5 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Depth Sensor) | 12 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 64 MP ƒ/2 (Telephoto) 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Auto-HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 8K @ 24 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p @ 30 fps HD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 8K @ 24 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p @ 30 fps HD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v11 | Android v10.0 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.73 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570 | 2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2x2.60 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G77 MP11 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, WMA, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA, APE, DSF, DFF |
| Video | Yes | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, WMV, ASF, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging | Yes, 25W |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 15W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |