Micromax X60 Modu T vs OPPO F22 Pro
Quick Comparison
In terms of display resolution, OPPO F22 Pro has better resolution of 2400 x 1080 than Micromax X60 Modu T which has resolution of 320 x 240. OPPO F22 Pro has more internal memory than Micromax X60 Modu.
| Name | Micromax X60 Modu T | OPPO F22 Pro |
| Display | 2.2 in | 6.58 in |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 2 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 500 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Camera | 5 MP | 64 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 3099 | Rs. 27660 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is October, 2010. The cost of Micromax X60 Modu T is Rs. 3099. The cost of OPPO F22 Pro is Rs. 27660.
Display comparison
OPPO F22 Pro has larger screen size of 6.58 inches in comparison to Micromax X60 Modu T's 2.2 inch screen. Micromax X60 Modu T has LCD Screen type where as OPPO F22 Pro has AMOLED Screen type. OPPO's phone has display density of 400 PPI & Micromax's phone has only 182 PPI display density. Micromax X60 Modu T has 4:3 aspect ratio where as OPPO F22 Pro has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
OPPO F22 Pro has more Internal Memory (128 GB) than Micromax X60 Modu T (2 GB).
Camera comparison
OPPO F22 Pro's 64 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear Camera outshines Micromax X60 Modu T's 5 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Micromax X60 Modu T | OPPO F22 Pro |
| General | ||
| Model | F22 Pro 5G | |
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | October, 2010 | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 46.5 x 75 x 11 mm | 75.6 x 164.5 x 7.89 mm |
| Weight | 62 g | 178 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color LCD Screen | Color AMOLED Screen (16.7M) |
| Touch | Yes | |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 6.58 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 182 PPI | ~ 400 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91.8% | |
| Glass Type | Schott Xensation glass | |
| Features | Vivid Mode: 97% NTSC/100% DCI-P3, Gentle Mode: sRGB | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 5 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 2 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 1 TB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | No | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v5.3 |
| USB | Yes | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | yes with A-GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Geomagnetic Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Optical Sensor, Accelerometer, Gravity Sensor, Gyroscope, Pedometer, Compass | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |
| IP Rating | IPX4 | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 64 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 Monochrome 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | Panorama, Portrait, Time-lapse, Slow-motion, Text Scanner, Google Lens, Extra HD, Macro, Sticker, Dual-view Video | |
| Video Recording | 1080p, 720p | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | No | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v13 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| GPU | 0 | Adreno GPU |
| Java | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports WAP | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Supports | MMS, YouTube Player | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AMR, MIDI, WAV | Yes |
| Video | MP4 | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 4800 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 67W Fast Charging | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| StandBy Time | 8 days | |
| Talk Time | 3 hours | |