Samsung Galaxy S25 5G vs Motorola Moto G200
Quick Comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 5G has better RAM than Motorola Moto G200. In terms of display resolution, Motorola Moto G200 has better resolution of 2520 x 1080 than Samsung Galaxy S25 5G which has resolution of 2340 x 1080. Samsung Galaxy S25 5G has more internal memory than Motorola Moto G200
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S25 5G | Motorola Moto G200 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.2 in | 6.8 in |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Camera | 50 MP + 12 MP + 10 MP Triple | 108 MP Quad |
| Price | Rs. 80999 | Rs. 42999 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is January 22, 2025. The cost of Samsung Galaxy S25 5G is Rs. 80999. The launch Date of the second phone is November 18, 2021. The cost of Motorola Moto G200 is Rs. 42999.
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G200 has larger screen size of 6.8 inches in comparison to Samsung Galaxy S25 5G's 6.2 inch screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 5G has LTPO AMOLED Screen type where as Motorola Moto G200 has IPS LCD Screen type. Samsung's phone has display density of 416 PPI & Motorola's phone has only 409 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 91.1% than Motorola's phone ~ 84.1%. Samsung Galaxy S25 5G has 20.5:9 aspect ratio where as Motorola Moto G200 has 21:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 5G's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Motorola Moto G200's lower 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy S25 5G has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Motorola Moto G200 (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G200's 108 MP Quad Rear Camera outclasses Samsung Galaxy S25 5G's 50 MP + 12 MP + 10 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Motorola Moto G200 will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 16 MP + 8 MP Dual Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy S25 5G's 12 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 15 and the second one on 11 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S25 5G | Motorola Moto G200 |
| General | ||
| Country of Origin | India | |
| Model | SM-S931B, SM-S931B/DS, SM-S931U, SM-S931U1, SM-S931W, SM-S931N, SM-S9310, SM-S931E, SM-S931E/DS | Moto G200 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | eSIM+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | January 22, 2025 | November 18, 2021 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 70.5 x 146.9 x 7.2 mm | 74 x 168.4 x 9.7 mm |
| Weight | 162 g | 207 g |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Colors | Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.8 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 144 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20.5:9 | 21:9 |
| PPI | ~ 416 PPI | ~ 409 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91.1% | ~ 84.1% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Features | HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | HDR10 |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | FDD Sub6: N1(2100), N2(1900), N3(1800), N5(850), N7(2600), N8(900), N12(700), N20(800), N25(1900), N26(850), N28(700), N66(AWS-3), TDD Sub6: N38(2600), N40(2300), N41(2500), N77(3700), N78(3500) | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 7, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be 2.4GHz+5GHz+6GHz, EHT320, MIMO, 4096-QAM | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.2, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C v3.2 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| Performance | ||
| AnTuTu Score | 2,086,331 (Total) (v10) 440,230 (CPU) 990,274 (GPU) 327,662 (Memory) 328,165 (UX) | |
| Geekbench Score | 8,923 (Multi Core) (v6) 2,437 (Single Core) 18,787 (OpenCL) 22,372 (Vulkan) | |
| 3DMark Score | 5,746 (Wild Life Extreme) (34.41 FPS) | |
| Speaker Score | 74 (Very Good) | |
| Battery Test Result | 12.8 hours | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | Yes, with dual-band AGPS, LTEPP, SUPL, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | No |
| Splash Resistant | No | |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | Photo Assist, Notes Assist, Drawing Assist, Circle to Search, Google Gemini (AI Mobile), 7 Years of Major OS Updates and 7 Years of Security Updates, Titanium Frame, Samsung Care+, Samsung Health, Samsung Wallet | Water Repellent Design |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP ƒ/2.4 (Telephoto) 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video | 108 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Depth Sensor) 2 MP (Macro) Macro |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | Spot Color, Night Vision, Cinemagraph, Portrait w/ HDR, Cutout, Live Filter, Panorama, Ultra-Res, AR Stickers, Pro Mode |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 8K, 4K, 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 16 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) 8 MP ƒ/2.4 (Ultra Wide) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v15 | Android v11 |
| Custom UI | OneUI 7 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ |
| CPU | 4.47 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.9 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M | 1x2.99 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680 |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 660 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA, DFF, DSF, APE | Yes |
| Video | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 4000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging | Yes, 33W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 15W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes, 4.5W | |