Oppo Tri Fold Phone vs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Quick Comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has better RAM than Oppo Tri Fold Phone. In terms of display resolution, Oppo Tri Fold Phone has better resolution of 3184 x 2232 than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold which has resolution of 2152 x 2076. Oppo Tri Fold Phone has more internal memory than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
| Name | Oppo Tri Fold Phone | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 11.2 in | 8 in |
| Internal Memory | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5015 mAh |
| Camera | 50 MP Quad | 48 MP + 10.8 MP + 10.5 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 199990 | Rs. 158999 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is expected to be September 10, 2026 (Expected). The cost of Oppo Tri Fold Phone is Rs. 199990. The launch Date of the second phone is August 20, 2025. The cost of Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is Rs. 158999.
Display comparison
Oppo Tri Fold Phone has larger screen size of 11.2 inches in comparison to Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold's 8 inch screen. Both the phones have OLED Screen Type. Google's phone has display density of 374 PPI & OPPO's phone has only 347 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, OPPO's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 91.9% than Google's phone ~ 88.4%. Oppo Tri Fold Phone has 4:3 aspect ratio where as Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has 6:5 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold's larger 16 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Oppo Tri Fold Phone's lower 12 GB RAM. Oppo Tri Fold Phone has more Internal Memory (512 GB) than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (256 GB).
Camera comparison
Oppo Tri Fold Phone's 50 MP Quad Rear Camera outclasses Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold's 48 MP + 10.8 MP + 10.5 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Oppo Tri Fold Phone will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 50 MP Front Camera in comparison to Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold's 10 MP + 10 MP Dual Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 15 and the second one on 16 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Oppo Tri Fold Phone | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold |
| General | ||
| Model | Pixel 10 Pro Fold | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | eSIM+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | September 10, 2026 (Expected) | August 20, 2025 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 150.4 x 155.2 x 5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | |
| Bezel less | No | |
| Colors | Moonstone, Jade | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color OLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color OLED Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 11.2 inches, 2232 x 3184 pixels, 120 Hz | 8 inches, 2076 x 2152 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 6:5 |
| PPI | ~ 347 PPI | ~ 374 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91.9% | ~ 88.4% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Cover Glass | |
| Brightness | 1800 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | |
| Features | HDR10+ | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Display | Yes, LTPO OLED, 6.67 inches, 1008 x 2232 pixels, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Yes, OLED, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2364 pixels, 2000 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak), 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4 | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE | Yes, v6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.1 | Yes, USB-C v3.2 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with tri-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer, Color Spectrum | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 50 MP (Wide Angle) 50 MP (Telephoto) 50 MP (Ultra Wide) 50 MP | 48 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP ƒ/3.1 (Telephoto) 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.5 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 127˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", PDAF |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Laser AF, panorama, HDR | Multi-zone Laser AF, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Video Recording | 4K, 1080p | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K, 1080p | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v15 | Android v16 |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G5 | |
| CPU | Octa Core Processor | 3.78 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | |
| GPU | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 6000 mAh | 5015 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 80W Fast Charging | Yes, 30W |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 15W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, 5W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes, 7.5W | Yes |