OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G vs Intaek 2200 Fighter
Quick Comparison
OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G has better RAM than Intaek 2200 Fighter. In terms of display resolution, OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G has better resolution of 2400 x 1080 than Intaek 2200 Fighter which has resolution of 320 x 240. OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G has more internal memory than Intaek 2200 Fighter
| Name | OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G | Intaek 2200 Fighter |
| RAM | 8 GB | 32 MB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.43 in | 2.4 in |
| Internal Memory | 128 GB | 64 MB |
| Battery | 4310 mAh | 1950 mAh |
| Camera | 48 MP Quad | 0.3 MP |
| Price | Rs. 21990 | Rs. 1089 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is March 08, 2021. The cost of OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G is Rs. 21990. The cost of Intaek 2200 Fighter is Rs. 1089.
Display comparison
Intaek 2200 Fighter has screen size of 2.4 inches which falls short to OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G's 6.43 inch screen. OPPO's phone has display density of 409 PPI & Intaek's phone has only 167 PPI display density. OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio where as Intaek 2200 Fighter has 4:3 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G's larger 8 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Intaek 2200 Fighter's lower 32 MB RAM. OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G has more Internal Memory (128 GB) than Intaek 2200 Fighter (64 MB).
Camera comparison
OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G's 48 MP Quad Rear Camera outclasses Intaek 2200 Fighter's 0.3 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G | Intaek 2200 Fighter |
| General | ||
| Model | F19 Pro Plus | 2200 FIGHTER |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Normal SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Feature Phone |
| Release Date | March 08, 2021 | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 73.4 x 160.1 x 7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color Super AMOLED Screen (16.7M) | Color |
| Touch | Yes | No |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 4:3 |
| PPI | ~ 409 PPI | ~ 167 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 90.8% | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 32 MB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 MB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 256 GB | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | No |
| 4G | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C | |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 48 MP ƒ/1.7 (Main) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro 2 MP ƒ/2.4 Mono | 0.3 MP |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus | |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p @ 30 fps HD | No |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | 16 MP ƒ/2.4 (Main) Punch Hole | No |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v11 | |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U | |
| CPU | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Core Details | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | MP3, AAC, APE, AMR, WAV, MID, OGG, FLAC, WMA | |
| Video | 3GP, MP4, AVI, WMV, MKV, ASF, FLV | |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 4310 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 1950 mAh |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 50W Flash Charging Technology | |