Sharp Aquos R9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G
Quick Comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has better RAM than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G. In terms of display resolution, Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has better resolution of 3120 x 1440 than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G which has resolution of 2340 x 1080. Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has more internal memory than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G
| Name | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Internal Memory | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Camera | 50.3 MP + 50.3 MP + 50.3 MP Triple | 50 MP + 12 MP + 8 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 103990 | Rs. 35168 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is October 29, 2024. The Expected cost of Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is Rs. 103990. The launch Date of the second phone is September 26, 2024. The cost of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G is Rs. 35168.
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has larger screen size of 6.7 inches in comparison to Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G's 6.7 inch screen. Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has OLED Screen type where as Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G has AMOLED Screen type. Sharp's phone has display density of 513 PPI & Samsung's phone has only 385 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 88% than Sharp's phone ~ 87.2%. Both phones have same aspect ratio of 19.5:9.
Memory comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G's lower 8 GB RAM. Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has more Internal Memory (512 GB) than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro's 50.3 MP + 50.3 MP + 50.3 MP Triple Rear Camera outshines Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G's 50 MP + 12 MP + 8 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Sharp Aquos R9 Pro will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 50.3 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G's 10 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones run on Android Operating System Version 14.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | SH-54E | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N, SM-S721BZKBINS |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | October 29, 2024 | September 26, 2024 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 78 x 162 x 9.3 mm | 77.3 x 162 x 8 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 213 g |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Colors | Black | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color OLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 1440 x 3120 pixels, 240 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | ~ 513 PPI | ~ 385 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 87.2% | ~ 88% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | |
| Features | Dolby Vision, HDR | HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | IEEE802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4 | Yes, v5.3 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go |
| Performance | ||
| AnTuTu Score | 1,778,977 (Total) (v10) 410,969 (CPU) 729,849 (GPU) 343,647 (Memory) 294,512 (UX) | |
| Geekbench Score | 5,831 (Multi Core) (v6) 1,890 (Single Core) 12,910 (OpenCL) 15,700 (Vulkan) | |
| 3DMark Score | 3,874 (Wild Life Extreme) | |
| Camera Score | 133 (DxOMark) | |
| Speaker Score | 81 (Very Good) | |
| Battery Test Result | 11.6 hours | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes | Yes with A-GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, NavIC, QZSS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Extra Features | SIM 1 + SIM 2/ SIM 1 + eSIM/ Dual eSIM | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 50.3 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", PDAF, OIS 50.3 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 65mm (telephoto), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50.3 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", PDAF | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP ƒ/2.4 (Telephoto) 75mm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) : 123˚ |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Leica lens, HDR, panorama | HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 1080p | 8K @ 24/30 fps UHD, 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p @ 960 fps HD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 50.3 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash | 10 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) 26mm Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v14 | Android v14 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen3 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
| CPU | 3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.11 GHz, Deca Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 | 3.1GHz, 2.9GHz, 2.6GHz, 1.95GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Xclipse 940 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 4700 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes, 25W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 15W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes, 4.5W | |
| Video Playback Time | 28 hours | |
| Music Playback Time | 81 hours | |