Sansui SA4011 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A
Quick Comparison
Xiaomi Redmi 9A has better RAM than Sansui SA4011. In terms of display resolution, Xiaomi Redmi 9A has better resolution of 1600 x 720 than Sansui SA4011 which has resolution of 800 x 480. Xiaomi Redmi 9A has more internal memory than Sansui SA4011
| Name | Sansui SA4011 | Xiaomi Redmi 9A |
| RAM | 256 MB | 2 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4 in | 6.53 in |
| Internal Memory | 512 MB | 32 GB |
| Battery | 1350 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Camera | 3.2 MP | 13 MP |
| Price | Rs. 2490 | Rs. 8488 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is December, 2014. The cost of Sansui SA4011 is Rs. 2490. The launch Date of the second phone is September 2, 2020 . The cost of Xiaomi Redmi 9A is Rs. 8488.
Display comparison
Sansui SA4011 has screen size of 4 inches which falls short to Xiaomi Redmi 9A's 6.53 inch screen. Sansui SA4011 has LCD Screen type where as Xiaomi Redmi 9A has IPS LCD Screen type. Xiaomi's phone has display density of 269 PPI & Sansui's phone has only 233 PPI display density. Sansui SA4011 has 5:3 aspect ratio where as Xiaomi Redmi 9A has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Xiaomi Redmi 9A's larger 2 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Sansui SA4011's lower 256 MB RAM. Xiaomi Redmi 9A has more Internal Memory (32 GB) than Sansui SA4011 (512 MB).
Camera comparison
Xiaomi Redmi 9A's 13 MP Rear Camera outclasses Sansui SA4011's 3.2 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Xiaomi Redmi 9A will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 5 MP Front Camera in comparison to Sansui SA4011's 0.3 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 4.4 and the second one on 10 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Sansui SA4011 | Xiaomi Redmi 9A |
| General | ||
| Model | Redmi 9A | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | December, 2014 | September 2, 2020 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 65.3 x 121 x 10.4 mm | 77 x 164.9 x 9 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color LCD Screen | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 4 inches, 480 x 800 pixels | 6.53 inches, 720 x 1600 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 5:3 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 233 PPI | ~ 269 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 81.1% | |
| Notch | Yes, Water Drop Notch | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 256 MB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 512 MB | 32 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 16 GB | Yes, upto 512 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| IR Blaster | No | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | No | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Splash Resistant | Yes, P2i Nano-coating | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 3.2 MP | 13 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 0.3 MP | 5 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v4.4 (KitKat) | Android v10 |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G25 | |
| CPU | 1 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | Yes | |
| Video | Yes | |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 1350 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Talk Time | 33 hours | |
| Music Playback Time | 7 days | |