Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Lite
Quick Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra has better RAM than Motorola Razr Lite. In terms of display resolution, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra has better resolution of 2176 x 1812 than Motorola Razr Lite which has resolution of 2400 x 1080. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra has more internal memory than Motorola Razr Lite
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra | Motorola Razr Lite |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 8.2 in | 6.67 in |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3440 mAh |
| Camera | 200 MP Quad | 50 MP + 13 MP + 2 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 199990 | Rs. 89990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is expected to be December 26, 2024 (Expected). The Expected cost of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra is Rs. 199990. The launch Date of the second phone is December 11, 2024 (Expected). The Expected cost of Motorola Razr Lite is Rs. 89990.
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Lite has screen size of 6.67 inches which falls short to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra's 8.2 inch screen. There is Screen Type in both the phones. Motorola's phone has display density of 393 PPI & Samsung's phone has only 374 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 90.9% than Motorola's phone ~ 70.7%. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra has 23.1:9 aspect ratio where as Motorola Razr Lite has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Motorola Razr Lite's lower 8 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Motorola Razr Lite (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra's 200 MP Quad Rear Camera outshines Motorola Razr Lite's 50 MP + 13 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Motorola Razr Lite will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra's 12 MP + 12 MP Dual Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 14 and the second one on 13 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra | Motorola Razr Lite |
| General | ||
| Model | Z Fold 6 Ultra | Razr Lite |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano + eSim | Nano + eSIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | December 26, 2024 (Expected) | December 11, 2024 (Expected) |
| Design | ||
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color Dynamic AMOLED 2X (1B) | Color pOLED (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes, 560 Hz Touch Sampling Rate | Yes |
| Size | 8.2 inches, 1812 x 2176 pixels, 144 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 90 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 23.1:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 374 PPI | ~ 393 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 90.9% | ~ 70.7% |
| Features | Infinity Flex Display, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Display | Yes, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 6.7 inches, 904 x 2316 pixels, 387 PPI, 23.1:9 Aspect Ratio | Yes, gOLED, 2.38 inches, 573 x 800 pixels, 4:3 Aspect Ratio |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | Yes, v5.1 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C v3.0 |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeiDou | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, Rear |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro sensor, Geomagnetic sensor, Hall sensor, Proximity sensor, Light sensor | Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Gyroscope, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | |
| Splash Resistant | Yes, Water Repellent Design | |
| IP Rating | IPX8 | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 200 MP (Wide Angle) 50 MP (Telephoto) 50 MP (Ultra Wide) 50 MP | 50 MP ƒ/1.88 (Main) 13 MP (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.2 (Depth Sensor) |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | HDR, Face Beauty, Dual Camera Bokeh, Timer, Panorama, Google Lens Integration |
| Video Recording | 8K, 4K, 1080p | 4K, 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, Dual LED |
| Front Camera | 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Main) 12 MP ƒ/1.8 Under-display Punch Hole | 32 MP (Main) |
| Front Video Recording | 4K, 1080p | 1080p |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v14 | Android v13 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 |
| CPU | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 5xCortex-A720@3.2 GHz & 2x Cortex-A520@2.3 GHz | 1x Cortex-X2@3.19 GHz & 3x Cortex-A710@2.75 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno GPU | Adreno 730 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA, APE, DSF, DFF | Yes |
| Video | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3440 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 80W Fast Charging | Yes, 33W Rapid Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 45W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, 4.5W | |