Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) vs OPPO Reno 12 5G
Quick Comparison
OPPO Reno 12 5G has better RAM than Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB). In terms of display resolution, Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) has better resolution of 2560 x 1440 than OPPO Reno 12 5G which has resolution of 2412 x 1080. OPPO Reno 12 5G has more internal memory than Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB)
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) | OPPO Reno 12 5G |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Internal Memory | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Camera | 16 MP | 50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 49900 | Rs. 22449 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is January, 2016. The cost of Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) is Rs. 49900. The launch Date of the second phone is July 12, 2024. The cost of OPPO Reno 12 5G is Rs. 22449.
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 12 5G has larger screen size of 6.7 inches in comparison to Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB)'s 5.7 inch screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) has Super AMOLED Screen type where as OPPO Reno 12 5G has AMOLED Screen type. Samsung's phone has display density of 515 PPI & OPPO's phone has only 394 PPI display density. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) has 16:9 aspect ratio where as OPPO Reno 12 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
OPPO Reno 12 5G's larger 8 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB)'s lower 4 GB RAM. OPPO Reno 12 5G has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) (64 GB).
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 12 5G's 50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear Camera outshines Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB)'s 16 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution. OPPO Reno 12 5G will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB)'s 5 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 5.1.1 and the second one on 14 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Dual Sim (64GB) | OPPO Reno 12 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Reno 12, CPH2625 | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | January, 2016 | July 12, 2024 |
| In The Box | Handset, Charger, USB Data Cable, Sim Ejector Tool, Quick Guide, Safety Guide, Protective Case | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 76.09 x 153.19 x 7.6 mm | 74.8 x 161.4 x 7.57 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 177 g |
| Colors | Matte Brown, Sunset Pink, Astro Silver | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color Super AMOLED Screen | Color AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes, 240 Hz Touch Sampling Rate |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2412 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 515 PPI | ~ 394 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 89.5% | |
| Features | Corning Gorilla Glass v4, Scratch-resistant glass Screen Protection | 1200 nits Brightness, Contrast Ratio: Static: 6,000,000:1 , HDR10+ Certified |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot) | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes 42.2 Mbps Download 5.76 Mbps Upload | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | |
| 5G Bands | NR: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78/n66 | |
| VoLTE | Yes | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 ac), 802.11 a/b/g/n (WLAN 2.4 GHz | WLAN 5 GHz), WLAN Display, WLAN Tethering, 2 x 2 MIMO | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v4.2 | Yes, v5.4, Supports SBC, AAC, aptX-HD, LDAC, and LHDC |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass | Geomagnetic Sensor, In Display Proximity Sensor, Acceleration Sensor, Gravity Sensor, Gyroscope, Step Counting |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Water Resistance | Yes | |
| IP Rating | IP65 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | S Pen included | AI Mobile, SAR Value Head: 1.20 W/kg, Body: 0.87 W/kg, LPDDR4X@2133 MHz, 2 × 16 bits |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 16 MP | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 26mm, 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 2 MP (Macro) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 16mm, 112˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Camera Sensor | Sony LYT-600, Sony IMX355 | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Optical Image Stabilisation, Face detection, Smile detection, Touch to focus | Photo, Video, Night, Pro, Extra HD, Pano, Portrait, Timelapse, Slo-Mo, Text Scanner, Macro, Sticker, Dual-view Video, Google Lens |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 5 MP | 32 MP ƒ/2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v5.1.1 (Lollipop) | Android v14 |
| Custom UI | ColorOS 14.1 | |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos A57 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| CPU | 2.1 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.5 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
| Browser | Yes | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | Yes | |
| Video | Yes | |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 3000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 80W Fast Charging | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |