Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G vs Oppo Find X5 5G
Quick Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G has better RAM than Oppo Find X5 5G. In terms of display resolution, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G has better resolution of 3088 x 1440 than Oppo Find X5 5G which has resolution of 2400 x 1080. Both have the same amount of internal memory.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G | Oppo Find X5 5G |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.9 in | 6.55 in |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Camera | 108 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP Triple | 50 MP + 50 MP + 13 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 116000 | Rs. 84990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is August 05, 2020. The cost of Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G is Rs. 116000. The launch Date of the second phone is February 24, 2022. The cost of Oppo Find X5 5G is Rs. 84990.
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G has larger screen size of 6.9 inches in comparison to Oppo Find X5 5G's 6.55 inch screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G has Screen type where as Oppo Find X5 5G has AMOLED Screen type. Samsung's phone has display density of 494 PPI & OPPO's phone has only 402 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 92.5% than OPPO's phone ~ 89%. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G has 19.3:9 aspect ratio where as Oppo Find X5 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Oppo Find X5 5G's lower 8 GB RAM. and both have same Internal Memory of 256 GB.
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G's 108 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP Triple Rear Camera outclasses Oppo Find X5 5G's 50 MP + 50 MP + 13 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Oppo Find X5 5G will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G's 10 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 10 and the second one on 14 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G | Oppo Find X5 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G | Find X5 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | August 05, 2020 | February 24, 2022 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 77.2 x 164.8 x 8.3 mm | 72.6 x 160.3 x 8.7 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 196 g |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color Dynamic AMOLED 2X (16M Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (1B) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 1440 x 3088 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.55 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 19.3:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 494 PPI | ~ 402 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 92.5% | ~ 89% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Features | HDR10+, Always-on display, Curved Display | HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Curved Display | Yes | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 1 TB | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | Yes, v5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C v3.1 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | Embedded S Pen | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 108 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 12 MP ƒ/3 (Telephoto) Periscope Telephoto 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 13 MP ƒ/2.4 (Telephoto) 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Auto-HDR, Panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 8K @ 24 fps UHD, 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p @ 960 fps HD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) 25mm, 1/2.74", 0.8µm Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v10, upgradable to v11 | Android v14 |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
| CPU | 2.73 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.84 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2x2.60 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.84 GHz Kryo 680 (Cortex X1) + 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 (Cortex A78) + 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 (Cortex A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP11 | Adreno 660 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 4500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 4800 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging | Yes, 80W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | Yes, 30W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, 10W |