Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Rizr Rollable
Quick Comparison
Motorola Rizr Rollable has better RAM than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Neither of them has front Flash. In terms of display resolution, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has better resolution of 2640 x 1080 than Motorola Rizr Rollable which has resolution of 2400 x 1080. Motorola Rizr Rollable has more internal memory than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
| Name | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Motorola Rizr Rollable |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.9 in | 5 in |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 3500 mAh |
| Camera | 13 MP + 12 MP Dual | 50 MP + 13 MP Dual |
| Price | Rs. 59999 | Rs. 159990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is June 01, 2023. The cost of Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is Rs. 59999. The launch Date of the second phone is December 11, 2024 (Expected). The cost of Motorola Rizr Rollable is Rs. 159990.
Display comparison
Motorola Rizr Rollable has screen size of 5 inches which falls short to Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 6.9 inch screen. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has LTPO AMOLED Screen type where as Motorola Rizr Rollable has Screen type. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has display density of 413 PPI & Motorola Rizr Rollable has only 393 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has better screen to body ratio of ~ 85.1% than Motorola Rizr Rollable's ~ 70.7%. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has 20:9 aspect ratio where as Motorola Rizr Rollable has 15:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Motorola Rizr Rollable's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's lower 8 GB RAM. Motorola Rizr Rollable has more Internal Memory (512 GB) than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (256 GB).
Camera comparison
Motorola Rizr Rollable's 50 MP + 13 MP Dual Rear Camera outshines Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's 13 MP + 12 MP Dual Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Both of them stand equal in terms of Front Camera Resolution as both have 32 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones run on Android Operating System Version 13.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Motorola Rizr Rollable |
| General | ||
| Model | Razr 40 Ultra | Rizr Rollable |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+ E-Sim | Nano + eSIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June 01, 2023 | December 11, 2024 (Expected) |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 74 x 170.8 x 7 mm | |
| Weight | 184.5 g | |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | |
| Colors | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color pOLED (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz | 5 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 15:9 |
| PPI | ~ 413 PPI | ~ 393 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 85.1% | ~ 70.7% |
| Glass Type | Gorilla Glass 7 | |
| Features | 1400 nits peak brightness, HDR10+,123% DCI-P3 | Rollable Dispaly up to 6.5 inch with 22:9 aspect ratio |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | |
| Dual Display | Yes, OLED , 3.6 inches, 1066 x 1056 pixels, 144Hz Refresh Rate, 4:3 Aspect Ratio, HDR10+ | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/ | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | WiFi-6E | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual Band |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3 | Yes, v5.3 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v3.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, Rear |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Gyroscope, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes | |
| Splash Resistant | Water Repellent Design | Yes, Water Repellent Design |
| IP Rating | IP52 | |
| Extra Features | Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos. LPDDR5 RAM | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5 (Wide Angle) 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 108˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP ƒ/1.88 (Main) 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) |
| Camera Sensor | Sony IMX563 | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | panorama, HDR | HDR, Face Beauty, Dual Camera Bokeh, Timer, Panorama, Google Lens Integration |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K, 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, Dual LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) 0.7µm | 32 MP ƒ/2.45 (Main) |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 1080p |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| CPU | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x Cortex-X2@3.19 GHz & 3x Cortex-A710@2.75 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz | 1xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 5xCortex-A720@3.2 GHz & 2x Cortex-A520@2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno GPU |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 3800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3500 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 30W Rapid Charging | Yes, 65W Rapid Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 5W | |