Micromax X725 vs Samsung Galaxy M12
Quick Comparison
Samsung Galaxy M12 has better RAM than Micromax X725. In terms of display resolution, Samsung Galaxy M12 has better resolution of 1600 x 720 than Micromax X725 which has resolution of 320 x 240. Samsung Galaxy M12 has more internal memory than Micromax X725
| Name | Micromax X725 | Samsung Galaxy M12 |
| RAM | 32 MB | 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 2.4 in | 6.5 in |
| Internal Memory | 32 MB | 64 GB |
| Camera | 0.3 MP | 48 MP Quad |
| Price | Rs. 950 | Rs. 10999 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The cost of Micromax X725 is Rs. 950. The cost of Samsung Galaxy M12 is Rs. 10999.
Display comparison
Micromax X725 has screen size of 2.4 inches which falls short to Samsung Galaxy M12's 6.5 inch screen. Micromax X725 has TFT Screen type where as Samsung Galaxy M12 has IPS Screen type. Samsung's phone has display density of 270 PPI & Micromax's phone has only 167 PPI display density. Micromax X725 has 4:3 aspect ratio where as Samsung Galaxy M12 has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Samsung Galaxy M12's larger 4 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Micromax X725's lower 32 MB RAM. Samsung Galaxy M12 has more Internal Memory (64 GB) than Micromax X725 (32 MB).
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M12's 48 MP Quad Rear Camera outshines Micromax X725's 0.3 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Samsung Galaxy M12 will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 8 MP Front Camera in comparison to Micromax X725's 0.3 MP Front Camera.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Micromax X725 | Samsung Galaxy M12 |
| General | ||
| Model | Galaxy M12 | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Mini+Mini SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Smartphone |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 75.9 x 164 x 9.7 mm | |
| Weight | 102 g | 221 g |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color TFT Screen | Color IPS Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 6.5 inches, 720 x 1600 pixels, 90 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 167 PPI | ~ 270 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 81.9% | |
| Notch | Yes, Water Drop Notch | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 32 MB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 MB | 64 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 16 GB | Yes, upto 1 TB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | No | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| USB | Yes | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Virtual Light Sensing, Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 0.3 MP | 48 MP ƒ/2 (Wide Angle) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro 5 MP ƒ/2.4 (Depth Sensor) |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | 0.3 MP | 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v11 | |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 | |
| CPU | 2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Core Details | 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | AMR, MIDI, MP3, WAV | Yes |
| Video | 3GP, AVI, MP4 | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | Li-ion Battery | 6000 mAh |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 15W Fast Charging | |
| StandBy Time | 7 days | |
| Talk Time | 4 hours | |