Karbonn K9 Viraat vs Duoqin F22 Pro
Quick Comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro has better RAM than Karbonn K9 Viraat. Neither of them has front Flash. In terms of display resolution, Karbonn K9 Viraat has better resolution of 1280 x 720 than Duoqin F22 Pro which has resolution of 960 x 640. Duoqin F22 Pro has more internal memory than Karbonn K9 Viraat
| Name | Karbonn K9 Viraat | Duoqin F22 Pro |
| RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.5 in | 3.54 in |
| Internal Memory | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 2150 mAh |
| Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Price | Rs. 3499 | Rs. 9990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The cost of Karbonn K9 Viraat is Rs. 3499. The launch Date of the second phone is November 24, 2022. The Expected cost of Duoqin F22 Pro is Rs. 9990.
Display comparison
Karbonn K9 Viraat has larger screen size of 5.5 inches in comparison to Duoqin F22 Pro's 3.54 inch screen. Karbonn K9 Viraat has IPS Screen type where as Duoqin F22 Pro has IPS LCD Screen type. Duoqin's phone has display density of 330 PPI & Karbonn's phone has only 267 PPI display density. Karbonn K9 Viraat has 16:9 aspect ratio where as Duoqin F22 Pro has 3:2 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro's larger 4 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Karbonn K9 Viraat's lower 1 GB RAM. Duoqin F22 Pro has more Internal Memory (64 GB) than Karbonn K9 Viraat (8 GB).
Camera comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro's 8 MP Rear Camera outclasses Karbonn K9 Viraat's 5 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Both of them stand equal in terms of Front Camera Resolution as both have 2 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 6.0 and the second one on 12 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Karbonn K9 Viraat | Duoqin F22 Pro |
| General | ||
| Model | F22 Pro | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Micro SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | November 24, 2022 | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 78.9 x 154 x 11.7 mm | 58 x 147 x 9 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 116 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color IPS Screen | Color IPS LCD Screen (16.7M) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels | 3.54 inches, 640 x 960 pixels, 60 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 3:2 |
| PPI | ~ 267 PPI | ~ 330 PPI |
| Notch | No | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 64 GB | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | yes with A-GPS, Beidou, Glonass |
| Fingerprint Sensor | No | No |
| Face Unlock | No | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Light sensor, Proximity Sensor |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP (Main) with autofocus |
| Video Recording | 720p | |
| Flash | Yes, Dual LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 2 MP | 2 MP (Main) |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android v12 |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| CPU | 1.3 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | AAC, APE, FLAC, AMR, MID, MP3, OGG, WAV, WMA, MKA | |
| Video | MP4, 3GP, ASF, AVI, FLV, M2TS, MKV, MPG | |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 2800 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 2150 mAh, Li-Po Battery |