Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G vs Motorola Razr 50
Quick Comparison
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has better RAM than Motorola Razr 50. In terms of display resolution, Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has better resolution of 2160 x 1914 than Motorola Razr 50 which has resolution of 2640 x 1080. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has more internal memory than Motorola Razr 50
| Name | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G | Motorola Razr 50 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 8.02 in | 6.9 in |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Camera | 50 MP + 13 MP + 8 MP Triple | 64 MP + 13 MP + 2 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 106990 | Rs. 59990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is August 11, 2022. The Expected cost of Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G is Rs. 106990. The launch Date of the second phone is expected to be June 21, 2024 (Expected). The cost of Motorola Razr 50 is Rs. 59990.
Display comparison
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has larger screen size of 8.02 inches in comparison to Motorola Razr 50's 6.9 inch screen. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has AMOLED Screen type where as Motorola Razr 50 has LTPO AMOLED Screen type. Motorola's phone has display density of 413 PPI & Xiaomi's phone has only 360 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Xiaomi's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 88.4% than Motorola's phone ~ 85.5%. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has 4:3 aspect ratio where as Motorola Razr 50 has 22:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Motorola Razr 50's lower 8 GB RAM. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Motorola Razr 50 (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50's 64 MP + 13 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear Camera outclasses Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G's 50 MP + 13 MP + 8 MP Triple Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Motorola Razr 50 will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G's 20 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 12 and the second one on 13 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 5G | Motorola Razr 50 |
| General | ||
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | August 11, 2022 | June 21, 2024 (Expected) |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 144.7 x 161.6 x 5.4 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 74 x 7.4 mmFolded: 88.2 x 74 x 15.8 mm |
| Weight | 262 g | |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | |
| Colors | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color AMOLED Screen (1B) | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 8.02 inches, 1914 x 2160 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 22:9 |
| PPI | ~ 360 PPI | ~ 413 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 88.4% | ~ 85.5% |
| Glass Type | Gorilla Glass 7 | |
| Features | HDR10+, LTPO 2.0, AI Master Image Quality Engine, 1300nit Brightness | 123% DCI-P3 |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Display | Yes, AMOLED, 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9, 120 Hz Refresh rate | Yes, AMOLED, 2 inches, 240 x 368 pixels, 1000 nits (peak), 282 ppi, Gorilla Glass Victus, 2:1, 60Hz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.2, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.3 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with tri-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum, Barometer | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes | |
| Splash Resistant | Water Repellent Design | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 50 MP f/1.8 (Wide Angle) 8 MP (Telephoto) 13 MP f/2.4 (Ultra Wide) with autofocus | 64 MP 0.7µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | panorama, HDR |
| Video Recording | 8K @ 24/30 fps UHD, 4K @ 30/60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, Dual LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | Punch Hole 20 MP (Wide Angle) | Punch Hole 32 MP 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle) |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD, 720p @ 120 fps HD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v12 | Android v13 |
| Custom UI | My UX | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 |
| CPU | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x Cortex-X2@3.19 GHz & 3x Cortex-A710@2.75 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz | 1xCortex-A710@2.91 GHz & 3xCortex-A710@2.49 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno GPU | Adreno 725 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 4200 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 67W Fast Charging | Yes, 44W Rapid Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 10W | |