Samsung Rex 90 S5292 vs Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G
Quick Comparison
In terms of display resolution, Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G has better resolution of 2400 x 1080 than Samsung Rex 90 S5292 which has resolution of 480 x 320. Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G has more internal memory than Samsung Rex 90 S5292
| Name | Samsung Rex 90 S5292 | Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G |
| Display | 3.5 in | 6.53 in |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 10 MB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 1000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Camera | 3.15 MP | 64 MP Quad |
| Price | Rs. 3724 | Rs. 27999 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is February, 2013. The cost of Samsung Rex 90 S5292 is Rs. 3724. The launch Date of the second phone is January 18, 2020 . The cost of Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G is Rs. 27999.
Display comparison
Samsung Rex 90 S5292 has screen size of 3.5 inches which falls short to Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G's 6.53 inch screen. Samsung Rex 90 S5292 has TFT Screen type where as Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G has AMOLED Screen type. OPPO's phone has display density of 402 PPI & Samsung's phone has only 165 PPI display density. Samsung Rex 90 S5292 has 3:2 aspect ratio where as Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G has more Internal Memory (128 GB) than Samsung Rex 90 S5292 (10 MB).
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G's 64 MP Quad Rear Camera outclasses Samsung Rex 90 S5292's 3.15 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Rex 90 S5292 | Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Reno5 Pro 5G | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | February, 2013 | January 18, 2020 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 61.9 x 113 x 11.9 mm | 73.2 x 159.7 x 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | |
| Display | ||
| Type | TFT Screen | Color AMOLED Screen (16.7M) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 90 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 165 PPI | ~ 402 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 92.1% | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | |
| Storage | 10 MB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v3.0 | Yes, v5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v3.1 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Geomagnetic Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Optical Sensor, Accelerometer, Gravity Sensor, Gyroscope, Pedometer | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP | 64 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) Macro 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Depth Sensor) |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | No | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v11 | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ | |
| CPU | 2.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Core Details | 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | |
| Java | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | MP3, eAAC+, WAV | MP3, AAC, APE, AMR, WAV, MID, OGG, FLAC, WMA |
| Video | MP4, H.263 | AVI, 3GP, MP4, WMV, MKV, MOV, ASF, FLV |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 4350 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 65W Fast Charging | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |