Samsung Galaxy M60 vs Vivo X200 Pro 5G
Quick Comparison
Vivo X200 Pro 5G has better RAM than Samsung Galaxy M60. In terms of display resolution, Vivo X200 Pro 5G has better resolution of 2800 x 1260 than Samsung Galaxy M60 which has resolution of 2340 x 1080. Vivo X200 Pro 5G has more internal memory than Samsung Galaxy M60
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M60 | Vivo X200 Pro 5G |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.5 in | 6.78 in |
| Internal Memory | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Camera | 48 MP + 16 MP Dual | 200 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 22990 | Rs. 62990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is October 12, 2019. The cost of Samsung Galaxy M60 is Rs. 22990. The launch Date of the second phone is October 14, 2024. The Expected cost of Vivo X200 Pro 5G is Rs. 62990.
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Pro 5G has larger screen size of 6.78 inches in comparison to Samsung Galaxy M60's 6.5 inch screen. Samsung Galaxy M60 has IPS LCD Screen type where as Vivo X200 Pro 5G has LTPO AMOLED Screen type. Vivo's phone has display density of 452 PPI & Samsung's phone has only 409 PPI display density. In terms of screen to body ratio, Samsung's phone has better screen to body ratio of ~ 91.8% than Vivo's phone ~ 90.3%. Samsung Galaxy M60 has 19.5:9 aspect ratio where as Vivo X200 Pro 5G has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Vivo X200 Pro 5G's larger 12 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Samsung Galaxy M60's lower 6 GB RAM. Vivo X200 Pro 5G has more Internal Memory (256 GB) than Samsung Galaxy M60 (128 GB).
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Pro 5G's 200 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP Triple Rear Camera outclasses Samsung Galaxy M60's 48 MP + 16 MP Dual Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Vivo X200 Pro 5G will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 32 MP Front Camera in comparison to Samsung Galaxy M60's 25 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 9.0 (Pie) and the second one on 15 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M60 | Vivo X200 Pro 5G |
| General | ||
| Model | Galaxy M50 | V2413 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | October 12, 2019 | October 14, 2024 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 76 x 162.4 x 8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Colors | Blue, Black, White, Titanium | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixels | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 409 PPI | ~ 452 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91.8% | ~ 90.3% |
| Features | HDR10+ | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 12 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 512 GB | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | |
| 5G Bands | n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78/n79 | |
| VoLTE | Yes | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC, A-GPS, Cellular Positioning, Wi-Fi Positioning, Geofencing |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Rear | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | E-Sim Support | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 48 MP + 16 MP | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 23mm, 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) 85mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 15mm, 119˚, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Camera Sensor | Sony LYT-818 & 200mm ZEISS APO Telephoto | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Video Recording | 2160p @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 25 MP ƒ/2 | 32 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v9.0 (Pie) | Android v15 |
| Custom UI | Funtouch OS 15 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.63 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver | 1xCortex-X925@3.63 GHz & 3xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 4xCortex-A720@2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3/WAV/WMA/eAAC+/FLAC | WAV, MP3, MP2, MIDI, Vorbis, APE, FLAC |
| Video | MP4/WMV/H.265 | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 6000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 15W Fast Charging | Yes, 90W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 30W Wireless Flash Charge | |