Micromax X60 Modu T vs Vivo X90 Lite
Quick Comparison
In terms of display resolution, Vivo X90 Lite has better resolution of 2400 x 1080 than Micromax X60 Modu T which has resolution of 320 x 240. Vivo X90 Lite has more internal memory than Micromax X60 Modu.
| Name | Micromax X60 Modu T | Vivo X90 Lite |
| Display | 2.2 in | 6.6 in |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 2 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery | 500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Camera | 5 MP | 50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Triple |
| Price | Rs. 3099 | Rs. 37990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is October, 2010. The cost of Micromax X60 Modu T is Rs. 3099. The cost of Vivo X90 Lite is Rs. 37990.
Display comparison
Vivo X90 Lite has larger screen size of 6.6 inches in comparison to Micromax X60 Modu T's 2.2 inch screen. Micromax X60 Modu T has LCD Screen type where as Vivo X90 Lite has Screen type. Vivo's phone has display density of 405 PPI & Micromax's phone has only 182 PPI display density. Micromax X60 Modu T has 4:3 aspect ratio where as Vivo X90 Lite has 20:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Vivo X90 Lite has more Internal Memory (128 GB) than Micromax X60 Modu T (2 GB).
Camera comparison
Vivo X90 Lite's 50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear Camera outclasses Micromax X60 Modu T's 5 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Micromax X60 Modu T | Vivo X90 Lite |
| General | ||
| Model | X90 Lite 5G | |
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | October, 2010 | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 46.5 x 75 x 11 mm | |
| Weight | 62 g | |
| Bezel less | No | |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color LCD Screen | Color E5 AMOLED LTPS Display (16.7M) |
| Touch | Yes | |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 6.6 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 182 PPI | ~ 405 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 92.2% | |
| Features | HDR10+, P3 Color Gamut | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 8 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 2 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | No | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes | Yes, USB-C v3.1 |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor, E-compass, Color Temperature Sensor, Physical Gyroscope | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 50 MP ƒ/1.75 (Wide Angle) 8 MP (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Telephoto) |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | Night Scene, Portrait | |
| Video Recording | 4K, 1080p | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | No | 32 MP ƒ/2.45 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p | |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v13 | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 | |
| CPU | 3.05 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Core Details | 1x Cortex-X3@3.05 GHz & 3x Cortex-A715@2.85 GHz & 4x Cortex-A510@1.8 GHz | |
| GPU | 0 | Arm Mali-GPU |
| Java | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports WAP | Yes |
| Multimedia | ||
| Supports | MMS, YouTube Player | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AMR, MIDI, WAV | WAV, MP3, MP2, MIDI, Vorbis, APE, FLAC |
| Video | MP4 | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 67W FlashCharge | |
| StandBy Time | 8 days | |
| Talk Time | 3 hours | |