Coolpad Mega 4A vs Duoqin F22 Pro
Quick Comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro has better RAM than Coolpad Mega 4A. Neither of them has front Flash. In terms of display resolution, Coolpad Mega 4A has better resolution of 1280 x 720 than Duoqin F22 Pro which has resolution of 960 x 640. Duoqin F22 Pro has more internal memory than Coolpad Mega 4A
| Name | Coolpad Mega 4A | Duoqin F22 Pro |
| RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5 in | 3.54 in |
| Internal Memory | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Battery | 2000 mAh | 2150 mAh |
| Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Price | Rs. 3990 | Rs. 9990 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is March, 2017. The cost of Coolpad Mega 4A is Rs. 3990. The launch Date of the second phone is November 24, 2022. The Expected cost of Duoqin F22 Pro is Rs. 9990.
Display comparison
Coolpad Mega 4A has larger screen size of 5 inches in comparison to Duoqin F22 Pro's 3.54 inch screen. Coolpad Mega 4A has IPS Screen type where as Duoqin F22 Pro has IPS LCD Screen type. Duoqin's phone has display density of 330 PPI & Coolpad's phone has only 294 PPI display density. Coolpad Mega 4A has 16:9 aspect ratio where as Duoqin F22 Pro has 3:2 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro's larger 4 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Coolpad Mega 4A's lower 1 GB RAM. Duoqin F22 Pro has more Internal Memory (64 GB) than Coolpad Mega 4A (16 GB).
Camera comparison
Duoqin F22 Pro's 8 MP Rear Camera outclasses Coolpad Mega 4A's 5 MP Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Both of them stand equal in terms of Front Camera Resolution as both have 2 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version 7.0 and the second one on 12 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Coolpad Mega 4A | Duoqin F22 Pro |
| General | ||
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | March, 2017 | November 24, 2022 |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 58 x 147 x 9 mm | |
| Weight | 148 g | 116 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color IPS Screen | Color IPS LCD Screen (16.7M) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels | 3.54 inches, 640 x 960 pixels, 60 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 3:2 |
| PPI | ~ 294 PPI | ~ 330 PPI |
| Notch | No | |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 64 GB | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | yes with A-GPS, Beidou, Glonass |
| Fingerprint Sensor | No | |
| Face Unlock | No | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Light sensor, Proximity Sensor |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP (Main) with autofocus |
| Features | Face detection, Touch to focus | |
| Video Recording | 720p | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 2 MP | 2 MP (Main) |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | Android v12 |
| Chipset | MediaTek A53 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| CPU | 1 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | ||
| Music | AAC, APE, FLAC, AMR, MID, MP3, OGG, WAV, WMA, MKA | |
| Video | MP4, 3GP, ASF, AVI, FLV, M2TS, MKV, MPG | |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 2000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 2150 mAh, Li-Po Battery |