Coolpad Cool 9 vs Umidigi A3 Pro
Quick Comparison
Coolpad Cool 9 has better RAM than Umidigi A3 Pro. In terms of display resolution, Coolpad Cool 9 has better resolution of 1520 x 720 than Umidigi A3 Pro which has resolution of 720 x 1440. Coolpad Cool 9 has more internal memory than Umidigi A3 Pro
| Name | Coolpad Cool 9 | Umidigi A3 Pro |
| RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.71 in | 5.7 in |
| Internal Memory | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 3250 mAh |
| Camera | 13 MP + 0.3 MP Dual | 12 MP + 5 MP Dual |
| Price | Rs. 5999 | Rs. 8335 |
Related Products
Detailed Comparison
Price And Launch
The launch Date of the first phone is June, 2019. The cost of Coolpad Cool 9 is Rs. 5999. The cost of Umidigi A3 Pro is Rs. 8335.
Display comparison
Coolpad Cool 9 has larger screen size of 5.71 inches in comparison to Umidigi A3 Pro's 5.7 inch screen. There is IPS LCD Screen Type in both the phones. Coolpad's phone has display density of 295 PPI & Umidigi's phone has only 282 PPI display density. Coolpad Cool 9 has 19:9 aspect ratio where as Umidigi A3 Pro has 18:9 aspect ratio.
Memory comparison
Coolpad Cool 9's larger 4 GB RAM is better for playing games and all with respect to Umidigi A3 Pro's lower 3 GB RAM. Coolpad Cool 9 has more Internal Memory (64 GB) than Umidigi A3 Pro (32 GB).
Camera comparison
Coolpad Cool 9's 13 MP + 0.3 MP Dual Rear Camera outshines Umidigi A3 Pro's 12 MP + 5 MP Dual Rear Camera in terms of resolution. Umidigi A3 Pro will be better choice if you're looking to click lot of selfies as it has better 8 MP Front Camera in comparison to Coolpad Cool 9's 5 MP Front Camera.
Technical comparison
Both the phones has Android Operating System but the first one runs on version v9.0 (Pie) and the second one on v8.1 version.
Related Comparisons
Full Comparison
| Name | Coolpad Cool 9 | Umidigi A3 Pro |
| General | ||
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June, 2019 | |
| Design | ||
| Dimensions | 71 x 148 x 8.2 mm | 70.2 x 147.2 x 8.5 mm |
| Weight | 138 g | 187 g |
| Display | ||
| Type | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 5.71 inches, 720 x 1520 pixels | 5.7 inches, 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 19:9 | 18:9 |
| PPI | ~ 295 PPI | ~ 282 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 90.3% | |
| Notch | Yes, Water Drop Notch | Yes, Large Notch |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 128 GB | Yes, upto 256 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v4.1 | Yes, v4.2 |
| USB | Yes, microUSB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Charging | |
| Extra | ||
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Rear | Yes, Rear |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic Sensor, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Camera | ||
| Rear Camera | 13 MP + 0.3 MP with autofocus | 12 MP + 5 MP with autofocus |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, Face Recognition, Real Time Filters |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, Dual LED |
| Front Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Technical | ||
| OS | Android v9.0 (Pie) | Android v8.1 (Oreo) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio A22 | Mediatek Helio MT6739 |
| CPU | 2 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 1.5 GHz, Quad Core Processor |
| GPU | IMG 8XE 1PPC | |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML5 |
| Multimedia | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3/WAV/eAAC+/FLAC | Yes |
| Video | MP4/H.264 | H.264, MPEG4 |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 3000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 3250 mAh |